Head of San Antonio park police union says DA should have issued felony charge over duck's death

The DA's office maintains the duck killed by a man on the River Walk was a wild animal, meaning it can't file a cruelty charge.

click to enlarge A duck was publicly executed at the San Antonio River Walk earlier this month. - Shutterstock / Sean Pavone
Shutterstock / Sean Pavone
A duck was publicly executed at the San Antonio River Walk earlier this month.
The head of the union representing San Antonio's park police accused the office of District Attorney Joe Gonzales of ignoring the advice of game wardens and experts by not to pursuing felony charges against a man accused of killing a River Walk duck last week.

Henry Bassuk, the president of the Park Police Officers Association made the accusation during an appearance on KLRN-TV current affairs program On The Record, which aired on Thursday.

Officers tried to file a third-degree felony charge of animal abuse June 17 in relation to the grisly incident. However, an assistant Bexar County district attorney who was at the magistrate's office refused, arguing that animal abuse only applies to domesticated live stock and pets.

"[The assistant district attorney] told the officers that it wasn't meeting the criteria of a captured animal," Bassuk told On the Record host Randy Beamer. "So, the officers went again and reached out to state game wardens and other people who have much more expertise in the area of wild animals, and it was confirmed by state representatives and state law enforcement that this was the appropriate charge for this incident."

Bexar County District Attorney's Office spokesman Pete P. Gallego told MySA last week that a charge of animal cruelty couldn't be filed because the duck in question was an "uncaptured wild creature." Animal cruelty only applies to domestic livestock or pets, he maintained.

Gallego did not immediately respond to the Current's request for comment.

Bassuk told Beamer that Gallego's previous comments didn't pass the smell test.

"[The law] would have required [the duck] to be previously captured," Bassuk said. "But, there's no definition as to 'previously.' Just the individual's act of capturing it prior to torturing it, in my opinion, and in the opinion of some of the legal people who have reached out to me, is a clear definition of it's captured right then and then you committed the act of torture."

On the afternoon of June 17, a 24-year-old man who police say may have been experiencing homelessness reportedly picked a duck up by its neck and began slamming it against the concrete pavement of a River Walk sidewalk, stunning onlookers.

The perpetrator, whose identity hasn't been released to the public, was only given a citation, sparking outrage from some community members.

"To do something as horrific as this with no emotion whatsoever, that has to be dealt with in the most severe way the law can deal with it, because it's going to lead to further violence," Bassuk told Beamer.

Subscribe to SA Current newsletters.

Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter| Or sign up for our RSS Feed

KEEP SA CURRENT!

Since 1986, the SA Current has served as the free, independent voice of San Antonio, and we want to keep it that way.

Becoming an SA Current Supporter for as little as $5 a month allows us to continue offering readers access to our coverage of local news, food, nightlife, events, and culture with no paywalls.

Join today to keep San Antonio Current.

Scroll to read more San Antonio News articles

Michael Karlis

Michael Karlis is a Staff Writer at the San Antonio Current. He is a graduate of American University in Washington, D.C., whose work has been featured in Salon, Alternet, Creative Loafing Tampa Bay, Orlando Weekly, NewsBreak, 420 Magazine and Mexico Travel Today. He reports primarily on breaking news, politics...

Join SA Current Newsletters

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.