Trending
MOST READ
Best Brunch

Best Brunch

Best of SA 2013: 4/24/2013
Jessica Chastain and James McAvoy Disappear into ‘Eleanor Rigby’

Jessica Chastain and James McAvoy Disappear into ‘Eleanor Rigby’

Screens: “If you’re going to start, you might as well start big,” an ambitious person once said. Ned Benson must have been paying attention, because for his first... By Cameron Meier 9/17/2014
The Permanent Gangsta Status of Mobb Deep’s Prodigy

The Permanent Gangsta Status of Mobb Deep’s Prodigy

Music: Prodigy, better known to ’90s rap aficionados as the prodigious half of Queensbridge duo Mobb Deep, has made a successful career operating on... By James Courtney 9/17/2014

Best Tattoo Shop

Best of SA 2013: 4/24/2013

Best Fajitas

Best of SA 2012: We wracked our brains over this one. Fajitas are pretty much all the same, no? Kinda like huevos rancheros. Our mind then drifted to a certain middle sister's wedding rehearsal... 4/25/2012
Calendar

Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.

Search hundreds of clubs in our database.

Follow us on Instagram @sacurrent

Print Email

News

Trollin' ain't easy, but is banning John Foddrill, and others like him, unconstitutional?

Photo: Michael Barajas, License: N/A

Michael Barajas


Both Bernard and McManus have declined to discuss the cases with the Current. Bernard refused to answer even general questions about how or why the city might choose to ban a citizen indefinitely.

"A Criminal Trespass Warning letter can be issued in direct response to a threat, threatening behavior, and/or harassment wherein repeated contacts by an individual are made thus creating an environment of fear," McManus wrote in a prepared statement. "Criminal Trespass Warning letters are typically issued when the behaviors previously mentioned are clear and obvious."

But while the courts have ruled government can put reasonable restrictions on time, place, and manner of free speech, a recent federal court decision against the City of Austin's criminal trespass policy proves San Antonio's tactics a clear unconstitutional overreach, civil rights watchdogs say.

:-/

Foddrill's well-known and sweeping allegations of corruption and mismanagement of city funds didn't materialize out of thin air, and appear to have had at least some basis when he began his fight in 2006. Former Current editor Elaine Wolff (who, now with Plaza de Armas, has written about the city's criminal trespass policy) first gave Foddrill's allegations a full vetting in a 2008 story, examining how Foddrill, while with the city's Information Technology Services Department, tried to blow the whistle on billing irregularities in his department that led him to a multi-million dollar slush fund. Months after notifying supervisors of the problem, Foddrill says he was escorted off the premises, fired over claims of poor job performance. Still, Foddrill clung to the hope that a 2009 whistleblower lawsuit against the city would clear his name and ultimately lead to criminal investigations for all parties involved.

Foddrill never got his wish. And soon after losing his whistleblower suit, Foddrill began firing off lengthy affidavits loaded with allegations that city officials who testified in his whistleblower trial lied under oath. Local FBI, Bexar County Sheriff's and SAPD officials all disregarded his claims.

Then, in July 2009, Foddrill got a call from his family attorney, who was leaving police headquarters downtown. "He said, 'John, they've got a photo of you posted at the front desk,'" Foddrill recalled his attorney saying. Within hours, two SAPD officers showed up on Foddrill's doorstep, hand delivering his criminal trespass notice signed by Chief McManus (who Foddrill routinely refers to in letters, emails, and online comment threads as "McAnus") and City Attorney Bernard.

For a year, Foddrill says, he sent letters to the city asking for an explanation. "I hired an attorney, spent good money asking why, and they still haven't given a reply," he said. Foddrill also filed numerous open records requests with the city, seeking any documents outlining any internal policy or decision that led to his ban. His requests turned up nothing. An open records request the Current filed in mid October requesting similar documents largely came up dry.

Recently in News
We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus