Trending
MOST READ
Beaches Be Trippin\': Five Texas Coast Spots Worth the Drive

Beaches Be Trippin': Five Texas Coast Spots Worth the Drive

Arts & Culture: Let’s face it, most of us Lone Stars view the Texas coast as a poor man’s Waikiki. Hell, maybe just a poor man’s Panama Beach — only to be used... By Callie Enlow 7/10/2013
Sky High: Getting acquainted with Christopher Ware’s Paramour

Sky High: Getting acquainted with Christopher Ware’s Paramour

Food & Drink: Christopher Ware leads our group into a lofty conference space with mile-high ceilings, two giant wooden tables and possibly the comfiest... By Jessica Elizarraras 10/1/2014
Artist on Artist: Gary Sweeney interviews Catherine Lee

Artist on Artist: Gary Sweeney interviews Catherine Lee

Arts & Culture: If I ever found myself teaching an art class, I would pack up my students and drive them to Wimberley, where I would give them a tour of... By Gary Sweeney 10/1/2014

Best Craft Beer Selection

Best of SA 2013: 4/24/2013
Savage Love: Friend in Need

Savage Love: Friend in Need

Arts & Culture: A straight male friend practices sounding and has for years. I am pretty sure he does other things that he isn’t telling anyone about... By Dan Savage 10/1/2014
Calendar

Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.

Search hundreds of clubs in our database.

Follow us on Instagram @sacurrent

Print Email

The QueQue

The QueQue: Southtown's un-friendlies, Scientology case ends with a whimper, Awkward timing for a bond ruling

Photo: , License: N/A


The River Road Neighborhood Association and the Headwaters Coalition, angered by the plan, took the city to court, saying it broke the contract with voters when it changed the voter-approved plan. They claim the revised plan doesn't move nearby properties out of the 100-year floodplain, and that it kills the Coalition's plans to build a "spiritual" reach of the river linking trails from Brackenridge up to the river's source at the Blue Hole.

Bebb Fancis, the attorney representing both plaintiffs, called last week's appeals court ruling "a devastating blow to public trust," saying it could have long-term effects on how locals look at future bond issues. In her 17-page opinion, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion said the word "permanent" wasn't used in the bond's drainage proposition, and that the city could change the project as long as it achieves the same goal stated in the proposal before voters — in this case, fixing flooding. Still, she wrote, voters should have "confidence that City officials have done their 'homework' when planning public improvements … prior to asking citizens to pay for the improvements. Otherwise, a loss of voter confidence may translate into a vote 'against' public expenditures."

The 2012 bond language is a little looser, listing instead improvements like "Goliad Road Drainage (from SE Military Drive to Loop 410, generally)." Emphasis on "generally." •

 

sa_20120502_pioneerstrike
Photo by Michael Barajas

Sal Garay, a former worker with C.H. Guenther & Sons Inc., demonstrates outside the company's flour mill. Workers with Teamsters Local 657 entered the second year of their strike against Guenther last week, seeking higher wages to offset more expensive medical coverage.

Recently in News
We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus