Best Vietnamese Restaurant

Best Vietnamese Restaurant

Best of SA 2013: 4/24/2013

Best Spa

Best of 2013: 4/24/2013
2060: SA looks forward, protects drinking water

2060: SA looks forward, protects drinking water

News: In just 14 years, the City of San Antonio has purchased 125,712 conservation acres over the Edwards Aquifer... By Mark Reagan 9/17/2014
Lost Bar Nails Drunk Food, Sports Bar Vibe

Lost Bar Nails Drunk Food, Sports Bar Vibe

Food & Drink: Much like the cookie-cutter houses that fill the North Side, (most) bars outside of 1604, hell outside 410, tend to have... By Jessica Elizarraras 9/17/2014

Best Place to Get High in Public

Around Town: Critic's Pick: 4/23/2014

Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.

Search hundreds of clubs in our database.

Follow us on Instagram @sacurrent

Print Email

The QueQue

The QueQue: Planned Parenthood hits back, Radwaste site's water risks ruled secret, Building lobby behind Build SA

Photo: , License: N/A

Planned Parenthood hits back

A group of Texas Planned Parenthood affiliates fired back at Texas last week, suing the state in federal court in hopes of blocking a new rule set to kick their clinics out of the Women's Health Program by the end of the month. The months-long standoff between Texas and the feds ended last month when the federal Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services announced they'd stop funding the Medicaid-waiver program, which draws down $9 in federal cash for every $1 the state chips in to give thousands of low-income and uninsured Texas women access to basic health care and family planning services (think birth control, breast and cervical cancer screenings). The program has helped Texas avoid some 17,00 Medicaid-paid unplanned pregnancies through family planning, not abortions.

The feds insist Texas' new rule banning "affiliates" of abortion providers like Planned Parenthood from the WHP violates longstanding federal law allowing Medicaid patients to choose the health care provider of their choice. Governor Rick Perry has insisted on fighting the feds, vowing to scrounge up enough cash to keep the program afloat — at least $30 million a year — without Planned Parenthood's participation. The state sued the feds last month over the ordeal.

Texas' Planned Parenthood branches, including San Antonio's Family Planning Associates, filed for an injunction in federal court last week to stop enforcement of the new rule so their clients can participate past the April 30 deadline, when the state says it will withdraw WHP funds from their clinics. Those Planned Parenthood clinics currently serve nearly half of all women enrolled.

The rule barring Planned Parenthood and "affiliates" of abortion providers isn't new. It surfaced when the Lege created the WHP in 2005, though the state didn't enforce the rule over fears of its constitutionality. The lawsuit filed Wednesday points to a letter former Health and Human Services Commissioner Albert Hawkins sent to state Senator Robert Deuell in 2009 saying, "implementing the subsection ban on contracting with organizations that are affiliates with abortion providers would likely be held unconstitutional by the courts."

The Planned Parenthood branches are arguing that very point in court, saying the new rule violates clinics' rights by putting "unconstitutional conditions on their eligibility to continue to participate in WHP." The lawsuit also claims the state's Health and Human Services Commission, charged with enforcing the new no-Planned-Parenthood rule, has "overstepped its authority in adopting a rule that conflicts with the purpose of the laws that created the program," namely that the law was created to expand the availability of health care to poor Texas women, not restrict it.

Recently in News
We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus