Trending
MOST READ
Beaches Be Trippin\': Five Texas Coast Spots Worth the Drive

Beaches Be Trippin': Five Texas Coast Spots Worth the Drive

Arts & Culture: Let’s face it, most of us Lone Stars view the Texas coast as a poor man’s Waikiki. Hell, maybe just a poor man’s Panama Beach — only to be used... By Callie Enlow 7/10/2013
Festival and Parade Planner

Festival and Parade Planner

City Guide 2014: If you’re new to San Antonio, you need to know that one thing we do extremely well is party. Here’s a list of some of our biggest and best parades and festivals so you... By Katie Bosworth 2/24/2014
Best Antique Store

Best Antique Store

People: Reader's Choice: 4/23/2014
Chris Pérez, Selena’s Husband, Faces His Past and Looks Forward, Musically

Chris Pérez, Selena’s Husband, Faces His Past and Looks Forward, Musically

Music: Chris Pérez never saw it coming. “All I ever wanted to do was play guitar,” he told the Current. “I never thought I’d be the subject of an interview... By Enrique Lopetegui 8/28/2013

Best Sex Toy Shop

People: Reader's Choice: 4/23/2014
Calendar

Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.

Search hundreds of clubs in our database.

Follow us on Instagram @sacurrent

Print Email

News

Prepare the Bat-Signal: Subdivision Plan Encroaches on Globally Significant Preserve

Photo: , License: N/A


“I just don’t see how they could put that many homes in under our water quality ordinance,” she said. “We’re all wondering how, exactly, they plan to do this.” Gene Dawson, the engineer for the project, did not return a call for comment Monday.

The San Antonio Water System Board approved sewer and water hookups for the development at its March 11 meeting. At least one SAWS board member is asking that SAWS rescind that vote, saying the board wasn’t given all the necessary information when it approved extending SAWS coverage.

In a letter he wrote to the GEAA last week, SAWS board member Sam Luna explains the board wasn’t told the proposed subdivision was located in Comal County. In addition, board members were never told “that Crescent Hills is also known as Comal County Special Improvement District No. 1,” created by the Lege in 2007 by Senate Bill 2008, which was authored by then-State Sen. Jeff Wentworth. (Further research shows Luna was off by one session. Wentworth’s 2007 bill got stuck in committee. He revived the bill and passed it in 2009.)

“This bill was carefully tailored to accommodate Galo Properties and its proposed planned subdivisions,” Luna wrote. While that state law directs Comal County to create its own water and wastewater facility, to be known as the “Comal County Water Improvement District No. 1,” board members were told the burden for water and sewer hookups fell to SAWS.

“Based on this disclosure, there is no need to provide SAWS water into Comal County, “ Luna wrote.

Along with circulating an online petition (which by Monday had garnered over 6,000 signatures), bat conservationists last week called for supporters to put pressure on City Hall, thinking the City’s Planning Commission would have to approve the Crescent Hills master plan.

It’s not clear if that’s true, since the site sits within the City’s ETJ and Comal County. John Jacks with the City’s Development Services Department told the Current that COSA and Comal County have an inter-local agreement that pushes responsibility to the City if a development has average lot sizes less than 0.4 acres. Anything above that is Comal County’s responsibility, he said, adding that Galo has yet to file anything with City planning.

Bat conservationists say City leaders they’ve contacted continue to tell them Crescent Hills is not COSA’s responsibility. “We’ve been amazed by the Texas two-step we’re getting,” said BCI conservation director Mylea Bayless. “Comal county is telling us they don’t’ have jurisdiction over what happens there, while the City of San Antonio has told us that it’s not in their purview to make these decisions.”

GEAA’s Peace said she worries Galo may be trying to sidestep aquifer protections by going to Comal County  — which doesn’t mandate the strict aquifer protections that COSA does — instead of the City’s Planning Commission. “The City is totally empowered to enforce its aquifer protections in this case,” she told the Current. “And if they’re taking a pass on this, they’re handing that developer a giant Christmas present.”

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus