Trending
MOST READ
Skin Deeper: Scarlett Johansson as predator in ‘Under the Skin’

Skin Deeper: Scarlett Johansson as predator in ‘Under the Skin’

Screens: One of the first images in Jonathan Glazer’s Under the Skin is a tiny white dot at the center of a black screen. At what are we looking? An eclipse? The sun... By David Riedel 4/16/2014
Alamo Colleges Barely Passed Its Own Accountability Test

Alamo Colleges Barely Passed Its Own Accountability Test

News: After months of passionate protest, petitions and public forums, faculty, students and administration of the five Alamo Community Colleges let out... By Mary Tuma 4/16/2014
Beaches Be Trippin\': Five Texas Coast Spots Worth the Drive

Beaches Be Trippin': Five Texas Coast Spots Worth the Drive

Arts & Culture: Let’s face it, most of us Lone Stars view the Texas coast as a poor man’s Waikiki. Hell, maybe just a poor man’s Panama Beach — only to be used... By Callie Enlow 7/10/2013
Best Bar Trivia Night

Best Bar Trivia Night

Best of SA 2013: 4/24/2013
There’s plenty to celebrate on the Old 97\'s 20th birthday

There’s plenty to celebrate on the Old 97's 20th birthday

Music: Back in the 1990s, when major labels would still propose multi-album deals to relative unknowns, Rhett Miller and the Old 97's sat in the offices... By Callie Enlow 4/16/2014
Calendar

Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.

Search hundreds of clubs in our database.

Follow us on Instagram @sacurrent

Print Email

News

Columbia Law School team publishes anatomy of a wrongful South Texas execution

Photo: Courtesy photo www.thewrongcarlos.net, License: N/A

Courtesy photo www.thewrongcarlos.net


Then the police officer inside the gas station who was doing the scene investigation heard that the eyewitness identification had occurred and then shut down the investigation after only about an hour and three quarters, even though this was an incredibly rich crime scene to go over. They never looked at the crime scene overnight because they folded up and ended it. They let the gas station wash it down and open the next morning. So there were bloody palm prints that people washing the gas station found but police never saw. There was a bloody foot print that the photograph shows that the jury was never told about — it's not clear whether the police saw it and just didn't want to say anything about it, or just plain didn't see it. There was lots of evidence missed that way. There was even a police audiotape of the manhunt that we discovered that had not been presented to the jury that showed that the police had chased somebody else for 30 minutes before they found DeLuna. Essentially the police dispatcher had pirated a copy of this tape, which he thought was one of the great moments of his time as a dispatcher, and then he left to go to Los Angeles to become a dispatcher there. So he just had it in his house  somewhere for years. It took us a couple months to encourage him to look hard enough to where he finally dug it up and showed it to us. The jury never heard anything about that tape, and yet the police and prosecution told the jury that this Hernandez didn't exist, that he was a phantom.

So it was a combination of those things and poor appeals where the case was rushed through and all of that added up to a very serious case where there's the very strong probability the defendant was innocent. Yet it's not that different of a case compared to so many others that we see.

What's the impact of an investigation like this? What can it teach us when looking at capital cases today?

I think the most important thing is to make us recognize the risk we take. There is a real risk of executing the innocent in these capital cases, and that's why it's so important that this case is no different from many, many others we see. It's not an unusual case. Nobody had identified it anywhere near the time of execution as one that we ought to be worried about. There are a dime a dozen cases like this. And so right now where there's a big debate taking place across this country, when a number of states have abolished [the death penalty], with California's big referendum coming up, people should be asking the question: What do we get out of this penalty that we don't get out of, for instance, life without parole? And with what risk and at what cost? We feel this book really demonstrates the risk and the cost: the worst kind of risk out there. We feel it demonstrates that there is a very real risk even in this kind of run-of-the-mill case.

There's nothing about this case where you can say, “Oh we don't do it that way anymore,” or, “That just doesn't happen anymore.” As I say, the defense attorneys were not the strongest in the world but this is not the worst case of ineffective assistance out there. You see similar cases out there everyday across the country, Texas and elsewhere. Prosecutors did not turn over all of the evidence, but there are many cases where you see even worse examples of that. The appeals were quick, but that's not unusual. Like I said, in many ways this is a very run-of-the-mill kind of case even for today. It's the way cases go today. And so the real risk of an innocent person being executed that we found in this case is a real risk that the system continues to take as long as it's prepared to execute people.

Recently in News
We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus